http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/05/16/comment-on-the-ia-response/ Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:24:24 +1200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/05/16/comment-on-the-ia-response/comment-page-1/#comment-4390 Thomas Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:49:13 +0000 http://thomasbeagle.net/?p=92#comment-4390 Thanks, I have asked IA for more details and I am waiting for their response. Thanks, I have asked IA for more details and I am waiting for their response.

]]> http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/05/16/comment-on-the-ia-response/comment-page-1/#comment-4389 Joesph Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:46:13 +0000 http://thomasbeagle.net/?p=92#comment-4389 Sam is correct, one of my mates works with one of the providers who participated in the trial and he said the system is able to process multiple sites hosted on the same address and only block access to those matching the government list. Sam is correct, one of my mates works with one of the providers who participated in the trial and he said the system is able to process multiple sites hosted on the same address and only block access to those matching the government list.

]]> http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/05/16/comment-on-the-ia-response/comment-page-1/#comment-2908 Sam Sat, 16 May 2009 10:13:55 +0000 http://thomasbeagle.net/?p=92#comment-2908 I recall the system used in the trial wouldn't block other websites hosted on the same IP address. I believe it would intercept that traffic, but if the URL doesn't match a blacklist it allows the web request to continue. Quite how that works isn't clear. From the OIA response, they claim they store no record of those requests. I recall the system used in the trial wouldn’t block other websites hosted on the same IP address. I believe it would intercept that traffic, but if the URL doesn’t match a blacklist it allows the web request to continue. Quite how that works isn’t clear. From the OIA response, they claim they store no record of those requests.

]]>