The Department of Internal Affairs has just issued a press release in which they:

  • State their intention to start the filter service within a couple of months.
  • Say that the filter will not cover email or file sharing.
  • Say that the information collected will not be used for law enforcement.
  • Claim that Internet NZ is happy with their plans.
  • Say that an independent reference group will be established to oversee the operation.

I have updated the general FAQ and technical FAQ with the new information.

Edit: DIA have released an amended version clarifying the position of Internet NZ.

Original version: “We understand that Internet NZ is happy with our plans but the society will be able to review the hardware setup to ensure it complies with industry best practice.”

Amended version: “Internet NZ has requested further information which the Department will provide. The society will be able to review the hardware setup to ensure it complies with industry best practice.”

It’s now available on their website, but here is the complete text of what they emailed me (amended version):

Media Release 16 July 2009

Web filter will focus solely on child sex abuse images

A filtering system to block websites that host child sexual abuse images will be available voluntarily to New Zealand internet service providers (ISPs) within a couple of months, Internal Affairs Deputy Secretary, Keith Manch, said today.

The Digital Child Exploitation Filtering System, funded with $150,000 in this year’s Budget, will be operated by the Department in partnership with ISPs, and will focus solely on websites offering clearly objectionable images of child sexual abuse, which is a serious offence for anyone in New Zealand to access.

“The filtering system is a response to community expectations that the government and ISPs should do more to provide a safe internet environment,” Keith Manch said. “It is not a silver bullet that will prevent everyone from accessing any sites that might contain images of child sexual abuse, but it is another important tool in the Department’s operations to fight the sexual abuse of children.

“The distribution and viewing of images of this abuse – wrongly called child pornography – is trading in human misery. It is the result of real children being sexually abused and exploited in the worst possible way. Each time anyone anywhere in the world accesses one of those images, the child depicted is victimised again.”

Keith Manch said the filtering list will not cover e-mail, file sharing or borderline material.

“Anyone trying to access websites offering child sex abuse pictures will receive a screen message saying the site has been blocked because it is illegal,” Keith Manch said. “The Department is developing a code of practice, which will be publicly available, to provide assurance that only website pages containing images of child sexual abuse will be filtered and the privacy of ISP customers is maintained. An independent reference group will also be established to oversee the operation. Anyone who feels that their access to a website has been wrongly blocked will be able to ask anonymously for the filter to be checked. The filter will not be used for law enforcement. “

The filter was successfully trialled with Ihug, TelstraClear, Watchdog and Maxnet over two years. It filters out over 7000 objectionable websites with no noticeable impact on internet performance.

“We understand that Internet NZ is happy with our plans but the society will be able to review the hardware setup to ensure it complies with industry best practice.

“Joining the filtering programme is voluntary and if any ISP subsequently is unhappy it will be able to withdraw. This is another way of ensuring that the Department gets the filter right.”

The Department has entered into a partnership with ECPAT New Zealand, part of a global organisation the purpose of which is the elimination of child prostitution and pornography and trafficking of children for sexual purposes.

“ECPAT is operating a hotline through its website ( so that members of the public can report suspect sites, not already identified by the Department.”

The Department will not disclose the 7000 objectionable websites which have been compiled through its own forensic work and with its international law enforcement partners.

“If we did, inevitably some people would visit them in the interim, effectively facilitating further offending and making the Department party to the further exploitation of children,” Keith Manch said.

Media contact:

Keith Manch, Deputy Secretary, Department of Internal Affairs

Ph 04 495 9329; cell 021 227 6363

Trevor Henry, communications adviser, Department of Internal Affairs

Ph 04 495 7211; cell 0275 843 679

5 Responses to “DIA Announces Internet Filtering Implementation”

  1. 1Foobar on Jul 16, 2009 at 2:27 pm:

    As I said here ( ), once the possibility is there to do more with the filter, the pressure to use it for ‘more’ than just blocking child-porn will grow.

    The list is secret, so how would we know? And what are their promises worth anyway, when the Steven Joyce blatantly lies about Internet filtering in New Zealand, just in March of this year?

    ‘Child porn’ is the ruse that gets this society to accept wide-spread government controlled censorship infrastructure. There is going to be more to come…

  2. 2zcat on Jul 16, 2009 at 3:16 pm:

    Thailand’s filtering started out ‘only blocking child sex abuse’, but according to wikileaks the most recent 1203 new entries are all critical of the government.

    But that’s OK, Australia has already shown how to avoid that problem. Just use the filter to block Wikileaks!

  3. 3cnawan on Jul 16, 2009 at 3:22 pm:

    At best you could block a few thousand images at those locations, but it costs them virtually nothing in time or money to evade the filter (heck, they could even automate it) and would cost huge amounts of time and money to make it any better. Not to mention that a better filter means more thinking over every little bit of information passing over the internet and a slower connection, it’s like a seesaw.

    Can we please all learn that it’s very hard to count something that’s growing really fast?

  4. 4Anonymous on Jul 16, 2009 at 5:18 pm:

    have the DIA heard of these?

    I guess the next category to block would have to be open proxies and anonymizer support networks.

    This is the thin end of the wedge.

  5. 5elderlybloke on Jul 16, 2009 at 6:15 pm:

    Will the censor be someone like Patricia Bartlett who was rampaging around
    a few years ago to protect us from anything she didn’t approve of.