http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/08/03/dia-deletes-records/ Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:24:24 +1200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/08/03/dia-deletes-records/comment-page-1/#comment-7047 thomas Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:35:46 +0000 http://thomasbeagle.net/?p=311#comment-7047 I have spoken to someone from the Ombudsmen's office about it and they asked for a copy of the DIA's letter. I've given it to them. I have spoken to someone from the Ombudsmen’s office about it and they asked for a copy of the DIA’s letter. I’ve given it to them.

]]> http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/08/03/dia-deletes-records/comment-page-1/#comment-7045 alphamatrix Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:32:10 +0000 http://thomasbeagle.net/?p=311#comment-7045 They definitely shoudn't have deliberately done that - it's against the Public Records Act! While I can understand that some files do get lost from time to time, deleting public records in preparation for the new list simply makes no sense. They definitely shoudn’t have deliberately done that – it’s against the Public Records Act!
While I can understand that some files do get lost from time to time, deleting public records in preparation for the new list simply makes no sense.

]]> http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/08/03/dia-deletes-records/comment-page-1/#comment-6873 Mark Harris Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:03:49 +0000 http://thomasbeagle.net/?p=311#comment-6873 I agree completely. That should go straight to the Ombudsman, with a copy to the Chief Archivist. Just because it was a trial doesn't remove the responsibility to keep records of it. I agree completely. That should go straight to the Ombudsman, with a copy to the Chief Archivist. Just because it was a trial doesn’t remove the responsibility to keep records of it.

]]>