<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Internal Affairs Letter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/08/24/another-internal-affairs-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/08/24/another-internal-affairs-letter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:48:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/08/24/another-internal-affairs-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-10518</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomasbeagle.net/?p=339#comment-10518</guid>
		<description>Oops, fixed the link. Sorry about that.

Text files - not sure. It seems that we get different responses depending on who is asking and who is answering. 

I also note that they are admitting to blocking &quot;link&quot; sites but then quickly say that they only did so if they had thumbnail images. I&#039;m experiencing some doubt on this.

It&#039;s exactly this sort of confusion that explains why we need a way to audit their list.

And as for Justin&#039;s message, I can&#039;t help feeling that it&#039;s just a spam trying to get more Google pagerank for their filtering system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, fixed the link. Sorry about that.</p>
<p>Text files &#8211; not sure. It seems that we get different responses depending on who is asking and who is answering. </p>
<p>I also note that they are admitting to blocking &#8220;link&#8221; sites but then quickly say that they only did so if they had thumbnail images. I&#8217;m experiencing some doubt on this.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s exactly this sort of confusion that explains why we need a way to audit their list.</p>
<p>And as for Justin&#8217;s message, I can&#8217;t help feeling that it&#8217;s just a spam trying to get more Google pagerank for their filtering system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack M.</title>
		<link>http://thomasbeagle.net/2009/08/24/another-internal-affairs-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-10515</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomasbeagle.net/?p=339#comment-10515</guid>
		<description>(You posted page 2 twice, missed out page 3)

So that stuff about text files being blocked doesn&#039;t sound like it&#039;s going ahead (at this stage)...?

  - Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(You posted page 2 twice, missed out page 3)</p>
<p>So that stuff about text files being blocked doesn&#8217;t sound like it&#8217;s going ahead (at this stage)&#8230;?</p>
<p>  &#8211; Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

